Q&A: Canon SD890 or SD990? Camera Enthusiasts Please Come In. ?

Issue by benjaminffalcon: Canon SD890 or SD990? Camera Enthusiasts Please Come In. ?
So I'm buying a digital camera for the spouse and I narrowed the choice down to two cameras Canon SD990 and Canon SD890. I don't know a lot about cameras but the following are the Distinctions in the stats. Which digital camera has an edge above the other? Most of these stats search like one more language to me. Digital camera enthusiasts make sure you give me some guidance. Thank you in advance!


Pixels:

SD 990 - fifteen.
SD 890 - ten.3

Nevertheless Image Recording:

SD 990 - Exit two.two (JPEG) Motion picture: MOV (Image: H.264 Audio: Linear PCM (Monaural))
SD 890 - Exit 2.two (JPEG) Motion picture: AVI (Picture: Motion JPEG Audio: Wave (Monaural))

Focal Duration:

SD 990 - 7.7-28.5mm f/2.8-5.eight (35mm film equivalent: 36-133mm)
SD 890 - 6.6-33.0mm f/3.two-5.7 (35mm film equivalent: 37-185mm)

Shooting Modes:

SD990 has much more shooring modes than SD 880

Shutter Velocity:

SD 990 - 15-one/1600 sec Prolonged Shutter operates with noise reduction when manually set at one.3-15 sec.
SD 890 - one/sixty-one/1600 intercourse., fifteen-one/1500 sec. Long Shutter operates with noise reductio when manually set at 1.3-15 sec.

Shooting Speed:

SD 990 - Approx 1.3 fps
SD 890 - Approx one.two fps

Optical Zoom:

SD 990 - three.7x
SD 890 - 5x

Aperture Variety:

SD 990 - f/two.eight (broad) - f/five.eight (telephoto)
SD 890 - f/three.two - f/5.7

Flash Assortment:

SD 990 - 1.6' - 15' (broad) one.6' - 7.9' (telephoto)
SD 890 - 12" - 11' (extensive) 12" - 6.6' (telephoto) at ISO Vehicle

Focus Range:

SD 990 - Typical: 1.6' - infinity Macro: two.0" - 1.6' (wide), one.3' - 1.6' (telephoto) Digital Macro: two.0" - 1.6' (vast)
SD 890 - Normal: 1.6' - infinity Macro: .8" - 1.6' Digital macro: .8" - 3.9"

Imaging Sensor Size:

SD 990 - one/one.7"
SD 890 - one/2.3"


Finest answer:

Response by Andre M
They both have their ups and downs, but from a technical standpoint 15mp is way to a lot of to pack onto a tiny sensor and is going to outcome in far more noise at increased ISO's, as well as even bigger file sizes that are not essential.

What do you feel? Solution below!